Leadership

Strategies to Lead Effectively in a Hybrid Work Environment

According to the Gallup Organization, the future of the office has arrived … and it is hybrid. In 2019, 60% of remote-capable employees spent their week working fully on-site, but that figure fell to just 20% in 2023. Hybrid work has increased significantly, becoming the most prevalent work arrangement in most offices. Approximately 40% of remote-capable employees have shifted from working entirely on-site to either a hybrid or exclusively remote work arrangement.

Let’s face it… the Hybrid Workplace is here to stay. And if handled effectively, it can be an excellent business model. Besides the obvious advantage of requiring less office space, it can also have several other significant benefits.

If leaders properly modify how they lead, it will increase productivity (sometimes significantly) and it will increase employee engagement. And an engaged workforce results in lower turnover and greater loyalty.

The question then, is what do leaders need to do in order to achieve these desirable outcomes?

Leaders need to address and modify how they interact with their direct reports.
And they need to implement initiatives to enhance team cohesiveness and collaboration.

One-on-One Initiatives
The interesting thing about the one-on-one initiatives related to a hybrid work environment, is that they’re the same initiatives a leader should be taking with his or her direct reports regardless of whether the work environment is hybrid or not.

Individual productivity and engagement rise when professionals are treated like professionals.

Treating professionals like professionals reflects the fact that someone who is a professional wants to do a good job in a timely fashion. They don’t need to be micromanaged or watched over. They don’t do their work because the boss is watching. They do their work because the want to do their work. And they want to do it well. It’s one of the reasons working remotely can be a positive force for increasing productivity.

But there’s an art to granting autonomy.

The first step is that it’s imperative that people are clear about what is expected of them. I’m not just talking about delegating a task to someone. (Although these insights apply to that as well.) I’m talking about the bigger picture. It’s critical to clarify the deliverables and responsibilities of each person’s role. Defining deliverables and responsibilities can be more difficult than it sounds, but it is critical for driving productivity and engagement.

Once the deliverables and responsibilities are defined, it is essential to hold people accountable. Not only does accountability ensure the work gets done but demonstrates that their work is important.

The final piece to this initiative is that there must be a consequence for not performing. If a leader states that certain deliverables and responsibilities are important, but then accepts non-performance without any consequence, it demonstrates a lack of integrity on the part of the leader. Plus, of course, the work doesn’t get done.

Why In-Person Matters
Although working remotely can have a strong positive impact on personal productivity, remote work can have a strong negative impact on a team’s productivity. Certain dynamics can only take place face-to-face. And that’s where video interactions fall short. For team members to work well together they must know, like, trust, and respect one another. Building trust and respect, along with having team members know and like one another, plays an important role in the success of a Hybrid Work Environment.

Trust, respect and connection foster team cohesiveness and collaboration.

And although some degree of trust and respect can be earned through knowledge and performance, most people form opinions about others based on what I call, “Moments of Apparent Insignificance”.

“Moments of Apparent Insignificance” are the little things we do or say without giving them much thought. These actions – to us – are relatively insignificant. We simply do those things or say those things in passing. But people form opinions about us based on those insignificant moments. They make note of the little things we do and say, along with how we do and say those things.

As people get to know one another, they learn about their lives, their personality, their dreams, their goals, and their fears. They get to know and (hopefully) like one another. And through these interactions – both professional and casual – they come to trust and respect one another.

Trust, respect and connection foster team cohesiveness and collaboration.

But in order for these Moments of Apparent Insignificance to occur, team members need to spend time around one another. Not structured time, but time when they can just be themselves.

And that’s where the team initiatives come into play.

Team Initiatives
Simply having people come into the office 1 or 2 or 3 days a week generally won’t achieve team cohesiveness. Because people are used to working independently, you need to have one or more techniques for maximizing interaction – both professional and casual – among the team members.

Here are three ideas for encouraging interaction on the days when each team is on-site:

1. Conduct Strategy Sessions with Whole Team
Conduct a strategy session with the whole team. It allows people to display their creativity, and everyone can see how various people interact. Not only that, but you may even uncover some interesting solutions to problems!

2. Encourage Project Brainstorming
Form teams of 3-5 people to brainstorm the design and execution of a project. (Vary the team members with each project.) This creates an opportunity for several people to get to know one another more deeply, eliminates posturing in front of the entire team, and allows team members to be more open and relaxed.

3. Hold Team Lunches
Plan a lunch for your entire team every 1-3 months. Organize it so that everyone can be in the same room. Ideally, you’ll want to hold it on-site rather than at a restaurant. People will feel more comfortable, and the casual setting will encourage people to mill around. It’s a great way for team members to get to know one another more casually and observe those Moments of Apparent Insignificance.

Conclusion
In conclusion, a Hybrid Work Environment can be an excellent model for increasing productivity, boosting engagement, and lowering turnover if handled correctly by the leaders. The results rely on leaders granting autonomy in an effective manner and implementing initiatives to ensure face-to-face interaction.

Executive Effectiveness: Stop Setting Goals

Over the years, I’ve seen this scenario over and over. An executive decides they want a real boost in growth and profits, so they set a big goal for their organization. Or, if they’re really ambitious, they develop a “BHAG” (a Big, Hairy, Audacious Goal).

Then they rally the troops, announce their big goal with lots of fanfare and encourage their team by proclaiming they are confident it can be achieved.

The pronouncement is then followed by a cascade of meetings at all levels, during which it’s explained how the goal can be accomplished, thereby ensuring buy-in throughout the organization. Strategies and tactics are developed in each department so that there is a clear blueprint for success in place. And the initiative begins…

The problem is that the goal is rarely reached. Despite all the hoopla and slogans, despite all the detailed plans and projections, and despite all the accountability, results fall short. Why do these initiatives almost always miss their target? Why are these goals not met? The answer is simple.

A “goal” has no emotional component to it.

If you understand people and how they make buying decision, you also understand that people buy emotionally. This holds true whether we want someone to buy a widget or buy an idea. We are emotional creatures and are prompted to action by emotion more so than logic. Yes, we rationalize our decisions logically, but the decision is made emotionally.

Although an initiative may have a well-developed plan, trying to get people enthused about a big goal is like asking people to get excited about doubling sales. No one cares. (Except the owners/shareholders and the person who came up with the goal). It’s unrealistic to expect an enthusiastic, committed response to a cold, arbitrary goal.

In order for something really significant to be accomplished, people need to work diligently towards its attainment. They need to maintain their commitment to it in the face of obstacles and setbacks. The only way to achieve that state is for everyone to “buy-in” to the initiative. And as I noted, people buy emotionally.

Therefore, if an executive truly wants a team to get behind an initiative and really strive to achieve it, the initiative must have an emotional component. There needs to be a compelling “why”. An effective initiative has to embrace a meaningful reason for the pursuit of it. Only then will the efforts be persistent enough to reach the objective. And, if the initiative is well thought out and relevant, the tangible “goal” will almost always be attained as a consequence of the quest.

An example of an initiative with an emotional component might be something like: “We want to be known in our industry as the premier provider of custom solutions. We want to set ourselves apart from our competitors by developing creative solutions for the difficult problems faced by our customers.”

This is an initiative people can get behind, rally around, and take pride in achieving. Also, because the initiative is a way of being rather than the attainment of an arbitrary number, the nature of the strategies and tactics developed will be very different from those created simply to drive sales in the next quarter. Additionally, because it will create a fundamental shift in the way the company does business, the results will be longer lasting.

If you want to be an exceptional executive, get away from setting goals and start developing meaningful initiatives.

The Enemy of Effective Execution

There are a lot of smart people in the business world, and they come up with plenty of good strategies to grow revenues, gain market share, increase productivity and improve profitability. And they usually create a plan which details the tactics that need to be executed in order to achieve that strategy. But as we all know, there is a big difference between creating a good strategic plan and executing it effectively.

The strategic plans that are developed generally make sense, but often get derailed by a couple of realities. To begin with, a new strategy often requires a change in perspective and a change in direction. It is essential that everyone on the team makes these shifts. In addition, a sense of urgency is often needed to achieve the objective of the strategy and gain the advantage the strategy offers. This urgency requires a certain amount of intensity and persistence.

And if those realities weren’t challenging enough, the final truth is that the business landscape is perpetually changing. The specifics that make sense at the start of execution may no longer make sense as the plan unfolds. In order to keep things moving forward smoothly and quickly, plans sometimes need to be changed and tactics modified. New, creative solutions need to be developed to overcome obstacles that arise. Attitudes must remain positive in the face of difficulties. With the right team in place, these strategies can be executed.

But to be executed effectively, there needs to be one more important piece in place.

One more piece needs to be in place, because the enemy of effective execution is a disengaged workforce. A poorly engaged workforce won’t be as flexible as it needs to be. A workforce that isn’t engaged won’t be especially productive, nor will it be as persistent as it needs to be. Weak engagement also causes people to focus on obstacles rather than solutions, and it dampens the creative spark needed to solve the problems that arise.

The enemy of effective execution is weak engagement.

How do you elevate employee engagement? Unfortunately, employee engagement can’t be improved overnight. Improved engagement is something that needs to be attained well before the need for execution exists. It’s analogous to digging a well for water. The best time to dig a well is before you need the water. Additionally, engagement is not something you “do” to employees. Instead, it’s the result of effective leadership and an effective culture.

If you’ve hired correctly, people are already engaged when they come to work for you. They don’t need to “become engaged”. The key to high employee engagement is to avoid the disengagement that occurs when leaders and managers treat people poorly, when they don’t respect and value people, and when they treat people like “things” rather than like people. Conversely, effective leadership and culture will keep a team engaged and will bring out the best in people.

Strategies can be effectively executed, but it takes an engaged workforce, focus, persistence, flexibility, creativity, and a desire to succeed. If you’d like help evaluating the current state of engagement within your workforce or would like help setting the stage for effectively executing your strategies, please contact me.

3 Keys for Bringing Out the Best in People

Bringing out the best in people is the essence of effective leadership. Although there are many important competencies required for effective leadership, there are three essential behaviors which play the greatest role in bringing out the best in people. These three keys are: Treat People Like People, Treat Adults Like Adults, and Show Appreciation. Let me explain why…

Treat People Like People
The issue here is the importance of treating people like people rather than like “things”. When a leader regards the members of their team as people, they acknowledge that everyone – regardless of position or tenure – has hopes and dreams, fears and stresses. They understand that people generally want to do a good job. And when results aren’t what the leader expects, he or she addresses the issue as one person to another, rather than to dish out a “scolding” or respond in a manner which treats people simply as an “asset” or a “resource”. In effect, good leaders treat people like they themselves want to be treated.

The adage, “Things get managed. People get led,” is true. The statement is an acknowledgement that people have feelings and respond accordingly. A leader who treats people like “things” lacks empathy. The consequence of leaders treating people in an impersonal way is that they’ll get a level of response from people, but not nearly the response and results they want.

In order to bring out the best in people, treat people like people.

Treat Adults Like Adults
The issue here is the importance of treating adults like adults rather than like “children”. A leader treats people like children when he or she insists that things be done their way. (“Do what I say, because I’m the parent, that’s why…”) A leader treats people like children when he or she micromanages. Micromanaging sends the message that a leader doesn’t trust the quality of a person’s work, their creativity, or their judgment. And when a leader lets people know they’re not trusted, the team quickly learns not to trust their leader.

In contrast, leaders who treat adults like adults grant plenty of autonomy. They also get to hold people highly accountable. When a leader grants autonomy, he or she communicate that they trust people to be professional, hardworking, and responsible. It shows that they trust their judgment and that they trust the work will be done as promised.

In order to bring out the best in people, treat adults like adults.

Show Appreciation
The issue here is the importance of appreciating the efforts people make rather than taking their efforts for granted or offering insincere recognition. The need for the esteem and respect of others is a key element of Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs.

It’s fairly self-evident that having one’s effort taken for granted can be disheartening. If a leader wants people to do and be their best, it’s important to demonstrate that he or she values them. That much is clear. But there is a difference between appreciation and recognition, and the distinctions are important to understand. Recognition is often provided under the guidelines of a recognition program which defines the parameters under which a person is entitled to some form of recognition.

On the surface, this seems like a reasonable approach which would encourage best effort. But there are two fundamental problems with recognition programs. The first problem is that a “structured” approach becomes impersonal and somewhat insincere. Recognition ends up bestowed upon someone because the program dictates that recognition be offered. The second problem is that recognition is offered to acknowledge a person’s achievement rather than their effort.

Most people want to be appreciated for their efforts more so than for their accomplishments. Appreciation is generally personal and heartfelt, given from one person to another. And it’s often spontaneously shown as a response to the effort someone put into completing a task. It is an expression of gratitude for someone’s effort, and its impact is immediate and long-lasting.

Telling someone you appreciate their effort in completing a project over the weekend has a far greater impact than offering a token of recognition for the end result. Plus, the degree of appreciation expressed is generally in direct proportion to the effort and/or sacrifice made by the person.

In order to bring out the best in people, show sincere appreciation for their efforts.

Eliciting excellence is the essence of exceptional leadership. If you want exceptional results, treat people the way you’d like to be treated, grant plenty of autonomy, and show sincere appreciation

Problem Leaders Are Expensive

We all know that problem leaders cause upset and drama, but the toll their behavior takes on an organization is not always obvious. It manifests itself in a number of ways and can be very costly.

First off, it affects results by creating a compliant team, rather than a team that’s committed to success. A committed and engaged workforce produces far better results than one that is simply complying with the commands of a poor leader. The Gallup Organization has conducted studies that show the ROI of an engaged organization is 2.5X greater than that of an organization with weak engagement. Problem leaders drive disengagement, which undermines results.

Secondly, problem leaders drive excessive turnover. Some turnover is expected, but high turnover is expensive. There’s the loss of productivity due to understaffing, the cost of recruiting, and the cost of low productivity during on-boarding and training. Plus, it slows progress quite a bit. Problem leaders cause high turnover and are expensive.

The next issue is that problem leaders drive “quiet quitting” – the dynamic where people “check out”. They don’t quit. And they show up to work every day. But they do the minimum required. Quiet quitting can become pervasive in a team led by a leader who’s always causing upset. Studies have shown that quiet quitting can be as high as 50% of a workforce. The impact, of course, is slower growth, missed deadlines, and mediocre results. Problem leaders are expensive.

The final issue relates to culture. Most people think of culture as the values and behavior a company aspires to. But in fact, a company’s culture is defined by the values and behaviors a company tolerates. When an organization tolerates things like bad behavior, a lack of mutual respect, poor communication, emotional outbursts, micromanaging, and treating people like things, a dysfunctional culture evolves, causing widespread disengagement. Problem leaders create a weak culture and are expensive.

Unfortunately, many companies wait until the situation becomes unbearable before they get help for a poor leader. Don’t make that mistake…