Culture

Moving From Compliant to Committed

As you well know, a team or an organization that is simply compliant produces mediocre results. On the other hand, if people are engaged and committed, the results are very different.

When someone is compliant, they simply obey – doing what’s asked of them but no more. Typically they’re doing just enough to keep their job. In contrast, someone who’s committed will spend time and effort outside of normal business hours thinking about work, solving problems, finding better ways to get the job done, seeking out new insights, and taking action.

What causes someone to be committed? There are a number of drivers of commitment. The first is that they need to have some degree of self-motivation. If a person isn’t self-motivated about the work they’re doing, they should find a job that has the kind of work they can be enthused about.

The second driver of commitment involves the person they report to – their leader/boss. A motivated, committed person will soon become unhappy if their boss is someone they don’t trust and respect.
Trust and respect must be earned over time. Trust is earned by acting with integrity and by acting in integrity. Acting with integrity means doing what you say you will do and acting in integrity means being the kind of person you claim to be.

Trust grows when a leader follows through on their commitments, and mistrust grows when they don’t follow through. Trust grows as a leader consistently acts in alignment with the values they say matter to them, and mistrust grows when someone claims to embrace certain values but acts in a manner at odds with them.

When it comes to respect, a leader demonstrates they respect someone when they listen to their ideas and interact with them in a respectful manner. When a leader doesn’t value people and doesn’t treat them with respect, their team loses respect for them.

The third driver of commitment involves the culture of the organization. A company that lives by the core values that matter to it drives engagement and commitment. On the other hand, an organization that claims certain core values but acts in ways which clearly demonstrate that those values don’t matter, soon causes widespread disillusionment and disengagement. It’s just like a leader professing the importance of certain values but acting in a manner at odds with those values. When a company tolerates bad behavior, it demonstrates a lack of integrity, which leads to a loss of trust and respect within the organization.

The fourth and final driver of commitment involves the nature of initiatives undertaken by the company, the department, or the team. An initiative without a reason, lacking any purpose other than to make the person who set the goal look good, leaves people flat. If an initiative is to drive commitment, there needs to be a “why”. People become engaged and committed when they believe in what they’re doing and feel they are making a difference.

If you want a committed workforce, start by ensuring that skilled people are being hired who are self-motivated and aligned with the organization’s culture. Ensure that leaders at all levels improve their interpersonal skills. Take a good hard look at whether the organization is living up to the core values it claims to embrace. And be clear about why initiatives are being undertaken.

If you’d like help driving engagement and commitment, let’s find a time to talk.
Helping leaders drive stronger results is my passion.

Company Culture: By Design or Default?

A company’s culture has a significant impact on attracting and retaining good employees, boosting engagement, and achieving a strong bottom line.

Over the years, I’ve had some interesting conversations with clients regarding their company’s culture. I remember one client (someone I was helping to groom as the owner’s successor). He told me how much they value their culture. Not only that, but they felt very strongly about “hiring to their culture”. In other words, they made certain that every new hire understood how important the company’s culture was.

As an executive coach focused on effective leadership, these statements were music to my ears! I naturally asked him, “So, what IS your company’s culture?” AND HE HAD NO ANSWER! It turns out, when they speak to new hires about culture, they simply tell them that their culture was important but offered no guidance as to what that was or what it meant. So, I gave him an assignment to better define their culture and reduce it to a handful of statements.

In our next coaching session, we discussed the list of values and behaviors the company strove to live by. We spent that session refining and clarifying the list so he could better express what mattered to the company to new hires and so he could better hold employees accountable to those values and behaviors.

I had a very different conversation with another client (the president of a company). This client had very clearly defined their culture and made sure that new hires were aware of it. But there was a problem. In fact, it was a major problem.

You see, most people think that a company’s culture is defined by the values and behaviors a company aspires to. That sounds great and makes sense. Except it’s not true…

A company’s culture is defined by the values and behaviors the company tolerates.

And who does that tolerating? The leaders do. The values and behaviors that the leaders tolerate become the company’s culture. But it doesn’t end there. It gets worse. When a leader professes to value a behavior but acts in a manner at odds with it, it demonstrates a lack of integrity. And when a leader is seen to lack integrity, people stop trusting and lose respect for that leader. And when people lose trust and respect for a leader, engagement drops and productivity suffers.

And that’s exactly what was happening at his company. Even worse, my client was as guilty as anyone in the company, acting at odds with the stated culture. Nevertheless, he couldn’t understand why they had so much trouble making progress and holding people accountable. Consequently, we began strategizing about how to change his behavior and the behavior of other leaders within the company.

So, here’s the bottom line…. A company’s culture needs to be defined. A culture that exists by default is always inferior and leads to lower engagement. And although a defined culture is superior to a culture by default, it only works when the leaders live by those values and behaviors. Plus, those leaders must not tolerate non-aligned behavior by others.
A positive, well-defined culture that people live by will attract better employees, and will result in stronger engagement and improved profitability.

Strategies to Lead Effectively in a Hybrid Work Environment

According to the Gallup Organization, the future of the office has arrived … and it is hybrid. In 2019, 60% of remote-capable employees spent their week working fully on-site, but that figure fell to just 20% in 2023. Hybrid work has increased significantly, becoming the most prevalent work arrangement in most offices. Approximately 40% of remote-capable employees have shifted from working entirely on-site to either a hybrid or exclusively remote work arrangement.

Let’s face it… the Hybrid Workplace is here to stay. And if handled effectively, it can be an excellent business model. Besides the obvious advantage of requiring less office space, it can also have several other significant benefits.

If leaders properly modify how they lead, it will increase productivity (sometimes significantly) and it will increase employee engagement. And an engaged workforce results in lower turnover and greater loyalty.

The question then, is what do leaders need to do in order to achieve these desirable outcomes?

Leaders need to address and modify how they interact with their direct reports.
And they need to implement initiatives to enhance team cohesiveness and collaboration.

One-on-One Initiatives
The interesting thing about the one-on-one initiatives related to a hybrid work environment, is that they’re the same initiatives a leader should be taking with his or her direct reports regardless of whether the work environment is hybrid or not.

Individual productivity and engagement rise when professionals are treated like professionals.

Treating professionals like professionals reflects the fact that someone who is a professional wants to do a good job in a timely fashion. They don’t need to be micromanaged or watched over. They don’t do their work because the boss is watching. They do their work because the want to do their work. And they want to do it well. It’s one of the reasons working remotely can be a positive force for increasing productivity.

But there’s an art to granting autonomy.

The first step is that it’s imperative that people are clear about what is expected of them. I’m not just talking about delegating a task to someone. (Although these insights apply to that as well.) I’m talking about the bigger picture. It’s critical to clarify the deliverables and responsibilities of each person’s role. Defining deliverables and responsibilities can be more difficult than it sounds, but it is critical for driving productivity and engagement.

Once the deliverables and responsibilities are defined, it is essential to hold people accountable. Not only does accountability ensure the work gets done but demonstrates that their work is important.

The final piece to this initiative is that there must be a consequence for not performing. If a leader states that certain deliverables and responsibilities are important, but then accepts non-performance without any consequence, it demonstrates a lack of integrity on the part of the leader. Plus, of course, the work doesn’t get done.

Why In-Person Matters
Although working remotely can have a strong positive impact on personal productivity, remote work can have a strong negative impact on a team’s productivity. Certain dynamics can only take place face-to-face. And that’s where video interactions fall short. For team members to work well together they must know, like, trust, and respect one another. Building trust and respect, along with having team members know and like one another, plays an important role in the success of a Hybrid Work Environment.

Trust, respect and connection foster team cohesiveness and collaboration.

And although some degree of trust and respect can be earned through knowledge and performance, most people form opinions about others based on what I call, “Moments of Apparent Insignificance”.

“Moments of Apparent Insignificance” are the little things we do or say without giving them much thought. These actions – to us – are relatively insignificant. We simply do those things or say those things in passing. But people form opinions about us based on those insignificant moments. They make note of the little things we do and say, along with how we do and say those things.

As people get to know one another, they learn about their lives, their personality, their dreams, their goals, and their fears. They get to know and (hopefully) like one another. And through these interactions – both professional and casual – they come to trust and respect one another.

Trust, respect and connection foster team cohesiveness and collaboration.

But in order for these Moments of Apparent Insignificance to occur, team members need to spend time around one another. Not structured time, but time when they can just be themselves.

And that’s where the team initiatives come into play.

Team Initiatives
Simply having people come into the office 1 or 2 or 3 days a week generally won’t achieve team cohesiveness. Because people are used to working independently, you need to have one or more techniques for maximizing interaction – both professional and casual – among the team members.

Here are three ideas for encouraging interaction on the days when each team is on-site:

1. Conduct Strategy Sessions with Whole Team
Conduct a strategy session with the whole team. It allows people to display their creativity, and everyone can see how various people interact. Not only that, but you may even uncover some interesting solutions to problems!

2. Encourage Project Brainstorming
Form teams of 3-5 people to brainstorm the design and execution of a project. (Vary the team members with each project.) This creates an opportunity for several people to get to know one another more deeply, eliminates posturing in front of the entire team, and allows team members to be more open and relaxed.

3. Hold Team Lunches
Plan a lunch for your entire team every 1-3 months. Organize it so that everyone can be in the same room. Ideally, you’ll want to hold it on-site rather than at a restaurant. People will feel more comfortable, and the casual setting will encourage people to mill around. It’s a great way for team members to get to know one another more casually and observe those Moments of Apparent Insignificance.

Conclusion
In conclusion, a Hybrid Work Environment can be an excellent model for increasing productivity, boosting engagement, and lowering turnover if handled correctly by the leaders. The results rely on leaders granting autonomy in an effective manner and implementing initiatives to ensure face-to-face interaction.

Problem Leaders Are Expensive

We all know that problem leaders cause upset and drama, but the toll their behavior takes on an organization is not always obvious. It manifests itself in a number of ways and can be very costly.

First off, it affects results by creating a compliant team, rather than a team that’s committed to success. A committed and engaged workforce produces far better results than one that is simply complying with the commands of a poor leader. The Gallup Organization has conducted studies that show the ROI of an engaged organization is 2.5X greater than that of an organization with weak engagement. Problem leaders drive disengagement, which undermines results.

Secondly, problem leaders drive excessive turnover. Some turnover is expected, but high turnover is expensive. There’s the loss of productivity due to understaffing, the cost of recruiting, and the cost of low productivity during on-boarding and training. Plus, it slows progress quite a bit. Problem leaders cause high turnover and are expensive.

The next issue is that problem leaders drive “quiet quitting” – the dynamic where people “check out”. They don’t quit. And they show up to work every day. But they do the minimum required. Quiet quitting can become pervasive in a team led by a leader who’s always causing upset. Studies have shown that quiet quitting can be as high as 50% of a workforce. The impact, of course, is slower growth, missed deadlines, and mediocre results. Problem leaders are expensive.

The final issue relates to culture. Most people think of culture as the values and behavior a company aspires to. But in fact, a company’s culture is defined by the values and behaviors a company tolerates. When an organization tolerates things like bad behavior, a lack of mutual respect, poor communication, emotional outbursts, micromanaging, and treating people like things, a dysfunctional culture evolves, causing widespread disengagement. Problem leaders create a weak culture and are expensive.

Unfortunately, many companies wait until the situation becomes unbearable before they get help for a poor leader. Don’t make that mistake…

The Hidden Cost of Quiet Quitting

Quiet quitting is one of the issues being talked about on a regular basis these days. It’s where someone becomes disengaged at work but doesn’t actually quit. Instead, they show up every day and do what’s asked of them, but nothing more. They basically do just enough to keep from getting fired. The Gallup organization estimates that quiet quitting comprises as much as 50% of the workforce in many companies! Obviously, this behavior curtails productivity, slowing a company’s growth, and causing lost revenue and profits.

But there is another, more expensive cost to the organization. And this cost is not obvious at first. It’s hidden until it reveals itself, which by then, is too late to fix.

It causes your best employees to quit.

Let me explain the dynamics and what you can do about it.

Typically, most organizations who have an intentional culture (meaning a culture that’s by design rather than by default), value things like professionalism, showing mutual respect, having integrity, being solution-oriented, and being collaborative. When a leader and/or an organization tolerates the behaviors associated with quiet quitting, it undermines the culture of the company.

Doing the very minimum is not only lazy, but it’s unprofessional. Professionals don’t need to be told in detail what needs to be done. They want to do a good job and will usually do whatever it takes to ensure the work gets done accurately and timely. But, when a leader tolerates a poor work ethic, it sends the message that there’s no need to work hard. Doing the minimum has no negative consequence.

Additionally, in order to meet deadlines and the needs of the organization – because the quiet quitters are slowing progress – the better, more engaged, more professional team members end up working harder to pick up the slack. After all, that’s what professionals do – whatever it takes to get the job done correctly and on time.

The consequence of all this is that many of your best employees will either become quiet quitters themselves or will quit and find a company who has a better, more positive culture.

So, how do you address and reverse the whole situation, so you avoid losing good employees and re-engage the quiet quitters?

Your initial instinct might be to take a harder line with quiet quitters and require them to step up their game or get fired. But this approach would be misguided. And it’s misguided because:

Quiet quitting is a symptom, not a problem.

When you take steps to address a symptom, it usually makes matters worse. The key, therefore, is to identify the underlying problem causing quiet quitting. And that brings us back to the well-known phrase: People don’t quit companies, they quit bosses.

Quiet quitting is caused by the way they are treated by the people who lead them. If people are treated like things, engagement drops. If adults are treated like children, engagement drops. If people are not treated with respect, engagement drops. If leaders lack integrity, engagement drops. And if leaders are unappreciative, taking people for granted, engagement drops.

Most leaders want to do a good job and want to be an effective leader, yet many fall short. They usually fall short for one or more of these reasons:

1. The skills needed to lead aren’t the same skills that got them where they are.
2. Many leaders model the same poor behavior they saw in the leaders who proceeded them
3. Regardless of intellect, education, or years of experience, we all have blind spots and can’t see what we’re missing.

The key, therefore, to reversing quiet quitting and all its implications, is to improve the effectiveness of the leaders and managers. Let me know if we can help you improve your team’s leadership effectiveness.